Foot Fault!

Calling all the lines of professional tennis

Category Archives: London WTFs

Federer Demolishes Nadal In London: A Few Fedal Fhoughts

Tonight at the 02 Arena saw a slightly anticlimatic finish to the long-awaited rematch between Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal, with Federer steamrolling the Spaniard, easing through 6-3 6-0 in an hour.

Roger? Majestic.
The bipolar opinions on Roger Federer’s form in 2011 have really been something else. After his various uncharacteristic losses this year, many have been quick to bring up his age, suggesting that he’s over the hill and ready to retire. And after great victories like the Roland Garros semifinal, naturally it’s back to serenading him as the GOAT who never left.

Of course, today saw another one of the latter performances – a stunning victory from Federer and his most one-sided win over Nadal ever. He initially looked nervous, but soon those nerves transformed into the flawless attacking tennis we’ve seen time and time again from him as he blasted laser-like winner after winner. However, instead of just jumping on and off the bandwagon, people need to realise that Federer is still more than capable of producing spellbinding displays like tonight’s victory, his age just means that they’re simply fewer and further between.

This victory puts him into the semifinal before anyone else, and judging by all performances to date, leaves him at least a mile ahead of the rest of the field.

Rafa… helpless?
Watching Nadal this year has been an experience void of any excitement joy or intrigue. You’re right, it’s odd to say that after a year which saw him capture a Grand Slam, two slam finals plus six masters finals including one victory, but it’s also the truth.

Seemingly every time he has come up against a quality player in good form, he has almost inevitably lost, and often heavily. And it’s not just that he’s losing the matches, it’s that he seems helpless. Victory seems impossible. You look at Federer when he’s down and regardless of the score, he is always a handful of big and flashy forehands from turning it around. It’s a similar story with Djokovic – just a couple of clutch backhands and returns that clip the very back of the baseline and he’s back in it. And even Murray is more than capable flattening out his strokes and unleashing some bullets to save himself in the most tense moments.

But Nadal? None of that this year. So often when he has been down, regardless of how much mental strength he posesses, it’s clear to all that there’s no way back. The issue isn’t simply a case of him being too passive – even today as he sunk further and further under Federer’s wrath, he was visibly attempting to be more aggressive and looking to control points. It just wasn’t happening for him. The result was always either an error off an over-zealous attempt or else Federer (similar to Murray in Tokyo and Djokovic in the first half of 2011) easily fending off Rafa’s desperate offense before effortlessly pulling his own trigger to find both the line and a winner, leaving Nadal humiliated and red-faced.

His tactics are certainly part of the issue, with so many players clearly finally finding ways to counter the ol’ heavy topspin to backhand tactic which has served Nadal so well over the years. But Nadal’s game in itself is also clearly having big problems. Is it because the courts are ironically too slow for Nadal, the hard surface taking the edge off his topspin and the lack of speed making it tougher for him to hit through the courts? Or is it simply mental? Only he knows.

Andy Murray Fights Back… In The Press Room

Sounds like Andy Murray wasn’t too impressed with Roger Federer’s recent attempt to play down his Asian run. And while Federer attempted to backtrack on his second day of media, Murray simply brought his own claws out and (for once in his life) went on the offensive.

“Winning three tournaments in a row is difficult – not many players have done that,” said Murray. “In Tokyo, I beat Rafa and David Ferrer, who is No 5 in the world. Who is there and who isn’t there is really irrelevant.

“You can only beat who is in front of you, but with the depth of men’s tennis you can’t expect to just turn up and win.’

“I always try, if I can, to be positive about all the other players,” Murray said, luxuriating on a Union Jack sofa. “Roger is one of the best players ever to play and I’m glad I’ve had the chance to play against him.” Did he think Federer feared him, then? Running around his backhand, Murray set himself for a forehand winner down the line.

And then the low blow:

“I don’t know if I am getting under Roger’s skin, but maybe I am [...] He’s entitled to say whatever he wants. I hope I get the chance to play against him this week and I can let the tennis do the talking.”

Maybe I’m just imagining it, but is that a touch of mind games I detect?! Sure, it’s hardly worthy of McEnroe and Connors or whatever, but it’s still something.

However, funny as his last comments were, I can’t help but feel that Murray is giving himself a little too much credit there. I mean, I’m sure Rafa’s triple slam-winning 2010 year most certainly ‘got under Roger’s skin’ while Novak’s incredible 2011 has likely had the Swiss sporadically tearing out large clumps of his hair all year. But Murray and his three tournament wins? Well..

But I digress, if they do end up facing each other this week then maybe this handbags will give both just that little bit more motivation to go for the victory. May the best man win.

Quotable Quotes: Roger Federer attempts to play down Andy Murray’s Asian Run

Not content on his rubbishing of Andy Murray’s strike talk a fortnight ago in Basel, according to the Daily Mail Roger Federer this week also had a lot to say about the Scot’s on-court form. Specifically his unbeaten run in Asia which saw him pick up three straight tournament wins and rise above Federer in the rankings for the first time in his career.

‘I’m not taking anything away from what Andy did, but was Asia the strongest this year?’ asked Federer. ‘I’m not sure. Novak (Djokovic) wasn’t there, I wasn’t there and (in Shanghai) Rafa lost early. But it has been a good effort by him after losing to Kevin Anderson in Montreal (in August). Don’t forget how things were looking then.’

Oh, Roger. Regardless of whether he’s right or wrong, I can’t help but love how he seems to be doing his best to drag his fellow rivals (except Rafa, of course) through the mud. The days of his quiet superiority are long-gone, and as so many have recently taken to criticizing the ‘big four’ for their friendships and lack of fierce off-court rivalry to match their on-court battles, Bitchy!Roger couldn’t have come at a better time.

The funniest part of the prose has to be the very first sentence, with ‘I’m not taking anything away from what Andy did, but…’ being the equivalent of a person saying ‘no offence’ before throwing a barrage of insults and criticism at the other. And behind the sincere smile and graceful flick of his hair which undoubtedly came as he uttered these comments, that’s essentially what he was doing.

But he does have a point. The fact is that both Djokovic and Federer pulled out with injuries while Nadal was nursing his own injuries in Asia. It won’t be the same this week nor is it the same in Grand Slams when everyone is present. However, as many have correctly pointed out, it was of course similar story during his own runs in Basel and Paris. It’s almost like Wozniacki laughing at Safin for her Rome and Madrid while simultaneously proudly holding up her Beijing and Copenhagen titles. But I guess the difference is that Murray’s run saw the usual hype and expectations come flying back as some British journalists made comparisons to Djokovic’s form in 2010 immediately before this career year while others agreed. On the other hand, Federer has been there and done everything. He has nothing left to prove – and even if he hadn’t won Basel or Paris, in my eyes he would still be a favourite here and everywhere based on the simple fact that he has done it all already.

Three Thoughts Ahead Of The ATP World Tour Finals

Today in London, the eight qualifiers for the ATP World Tour Finals were drawn into their groups for the very last time in 2011, and we were finally given a glimpse into what the final week of the ATP tour will in store for us. Check out the draw below.


Sunday & Monday OOP

1) Federer-Djokovic and Murray-Nadal who?
It seems like the World Tour Finals is pretty much the only tournament on the planet in which Djokovic-Federer and Murray-Nadal don’t have an invisible magnet drawing them to each other. And thus, we will see an intriguing pair of Round Robin match-ups between Federer-Nadal and Djokovic-Murray instead of the same ol’ match-ups. Of course, that means that the semifinals could well be exactly the same as the four projected Grand Slam semifinal line-ups of this year, but that’s okay.

2) Watch out for the two dark horses.
2011 has been unprecedented in the domination of four players on the rest of the field. But exciting as it has been to sit back and watch these four great players, the lack of consistent competition from the vast pool of talent immediately underneath the four has been a disappointing lowlight of this season. However, both Tsonga and Berdych impressed last week in Paris and are perfectly poised in their groups to create some noise, take out a bigger name or two and possibly even make it out of their groups. And I think they just might do it.

3) Doubles? Love it… but only in moderation.
Ever since I attended the WTFs as a spectator in its inaugural year, it’s hard not to get a bitter taste in my mouth every time when looking at the order of play. Just as only four doubles teams eligible for the WTA year-end event makes the event pointless and uninteresting, eight just feels like too much. The only real purpose it serves is allowing the already extortionate WTFs the chance to create more revenue by enforcing a day and night session with only one singles match per session. A complete waste of money.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,228 other followers